07Dec
Will I Owe Spousal Maintenance?

Posted by Crider Law | Posted in Affects of Divorce, Family Law Attorney

In the state of Arizona, spousal maintenance is determined by a two-part analysis of all relevant factors pertaining to the financial, academic, and career standing of both spouses. The first level of analysis determines the eligibility of both spouses to receive or give spousal maintenance. The second level then takes into consideration the assets and abilities of both spouses. This information is then used to determine how much spousal maintenance will be owed upon the dissolution of the marriage. Spousal maintenance can be a challenging hurdle in the divorce settlement process because it requires significant documentation of past, present, and current circumstances. Here are some things to consider as you discuss spousal maintenance with your attorney:

Part 1: Eligibility

Since every case is unique, a judge must consider these important factors in relation to the specific needs of the individuals to determine if either spouse is eligible for monetary support. To determine if you will owe spousal maintenance, your attorney and the courts of law will need to know:

1) If your spouse has reasonable living accommodations and other necessary property.

2) If your spouse’s income and means of employment warrants self-sufficiency.

3) The duration of the marriage

4) The age of the spouse in relation to the time it would take to achieve academic and economic self-sufficiency.

Essentially, the courts must verify that both spouses are independently self-sufficient or able to become self-sufficient within a reasonable amount of time following the divorce. If your spouse is absolutely unable to provide for themselves due to an unequal division of assets, educational shortcomings, or demanding childcare obligations, they may be eligible for spousal maintenance.

Part 2: Considering All Relevant Factors

If your spouse is found eligible for spousal maintenance, the following factors are then assessed to fairly decide spousal support following the divorce:

1) The standard of living within the marriage

– Did you live above or below your means?

2) The duration of the marriage

– How much time was invested in the marriage?

3) Level of education, career experience, and earning potential

– Did either spouse quit past jobs to take care of children? Do they have enough education to return to the work force?

4) The physical, mental, and emotional condition of the spouse seeking support

– Does one spouse have significant health requirements that warrant spousal support?

5) The ability of the supporting spouse to meet their own needs while providing support to their former spouse

– Can one spouse adequately provide for themselves while partially providing for the other?

6) All contributions made by both parties to childcare and household income during the marriage

– Was the division of household labor, childcare, and income from earnings equal between spouses?

7) Any sacrifice of educational or career opportunities made by the spouse seeking support for the benefit of the other, their marriage, or their children

– Has one spouse’s earning potential been reduced while the other spouse’s has been advanced?

8) The ability of the spouse seeking support to obtain educational advancement and employment if necessary (with consideration of financial restrictions and time constraints)

– Is necessary educational training readily available? How much will it cost? How long will it take to complete the education and find adequate employment?

9) The extent to which both parties can contribute to children’s education costs

– Will spousal maintenance be necessary to help one parent contribute?

10) Health insurance costs for both parties

– How much will new coverage cost? How much money will be saved in the reduction of the current health insurance plan?

11) An imbalance in financial assets or properties

– What debts have both spouses incurred independently? Does either spouse have hidden assets?

12) Any criminal convictions

– Were there any charges of domestic violence in which the spouse or child was a victim? What other damages were incurred?

Each case is substantially unique and requires an in-depth look at very personal matters. You can trust the experienced family law attorneys at Crider Law to work with you to establish a fair spousal maintenance agreement and ensure your needs are taken care of. Brad Crider is an expert on the complex division of assets and will work hard to create a fair divorce settlement for your individual circumstance. Call Crider Law today to set up an initial consultation.

03Dec
Understanding Recent Changes in Arizona Custody Laws

Posted by Crider Law | Posted in Child Custody Law, Family Law Attorney

Some important changes were recently made to the Arizona child custody legislation that went into full effect January 1, 2013. Some terminology was modified and some amendments were made in order to clarify the purpose and procedures of the courts when determining custody arrangements for children of divorced parents. The new legislation aims to provide fair treatment for mothers and fathers in court conclusions about custody and further maximize the time both parents spend with their children.

Terminology

Most significantly, the word “custody” is almost completely removed from the legislation in order to clarify the difference between legal and physical custody. “Legal custody” is now referred to as “legal decision-making” and encompasses the right a parent has to make necessary decisions for the child about education, health and personal care, and religious upbringing. A judge may grant joint legal decision-making, dividing these responsibilities between parents, or give one parent sole legal decision-making authority.

“Physical custody” is now referred to as “parenting time” and indicates the time a child is allotted with each parent. While previously, “visitation” was thought to refer to the allotment of time granted to the non-custodial parent, this is an incorrect interpretation. “Visitation”, as far as the courts are concerned, is any time someone other than a legal parent spends with a child (such as grandparents). [For more information on visitation rights of grandparents, click here].

Equality

Arizona legislators are also making efforts to eliminate the biased designation of legal decision-making rights and parenting time based on gender. This gives fathers more of a fair fight in a custody battle, as historically women have been favored for sole guardianship of children or a majority of the parenting time. While the courts had already concluded that having both parents present in a child’s life is in their best interest, the new Arizona custody legislation aims to give both parents equal and maximum time with their children.

A conditional factor was also added to give children more of a say in the division of parenting time, given the court deems the child old enough and mature enough to understand their circumstances. Ultimately, a judge still has the authority to decide how much parenting time each parent receives, but these new clauses will hopefully provide children with cohesive parental relationships, despite the dissolution of a marriage.

Additionally, the legislation used to decree that custody rights were determined based on which parent, if either, provided the majority of the child’s primary care in the past. This process has been changed to take into consideration the past, present, and future potential of a parental relationship.

Fines are now being enforced on parents who intentionally delay court proceedings or are not forthcoming with pertinent information. Prior to the new legislation, these fines were optional based on the judge’s discretion.

Non-Retroactive

Unfortunately, these new decrees were not intended to be retroactive, nor do they guarantee that a new petition for custody changes will grant the family a different outcome. Parents who wish to petition for their custody agreement to be more in line with the new statutes must still provide adequate proof of change in circumstances. [See “Changing my Child Support” for more information].

For the best results in a custody case, it is important to work with a family law attorney who has experience with the legal process and is an expert on how these changes to Arizona custody laws can affect your family. Brad Crider is well qualified to help you through even the toughest custody arrangement or divorce settlement. To set up an initial consultation, contact Crider Law today.

08Oct
Judge Pro Tem – What does it mean?

Posted by Crider Law | Posted in Family Law Attorney

By now, we hope you’ve heard the news that Mesa Arizona Family Law Attorney Brad Crider has been appointed as Superior Court Judge Pro Tem in Maricopa County. So what exactly does that mean and how does it benefit the families and clients he works with?

Being appointed as Judge Pro Tem is no small task. First, an attorney must meet the qualifications, which include:

At least 30 years of age
Of good moral character
Admitted to the practice of law in this state for not less than 5 years preceding his/her appointment

Once qualified, attorneys must then go through an extensive application process and then be selected and appointed as Judge Pro Tem.

A Judge Pro Tem serves as a temporary judge. They are not considered a regular judge, but are called upon to serve temporarily as a judge, as long as both parties involved in a case consent. A court might call upon a Judge Pro Tem to serve when there are too many cases for regular judges to handle.

In most cases, a Judge Pro Tem is asked to hear a case in a matter that is in their field of practice. For example, a family law attorney serving as Judge Pro Tem will typically hear or oversee family law cases. When they serve, they hold all of the same powers as a regular judge, including the ability to pass judgment when necessary.

For Brad, serving as a Judge Pro Tem will allow him to put his knowledge of family law to use in a direct way. He’ll continue to gain valuable experience that will help him sharpen his skills as an attorney. Serving in the capacity will also give him insight into other family law cases and give him opportunities to see the legal system from a different point of view.

Because Brad is consistently client-focused, there is no doubt that this experience will only serve to benefit Brad’s clients and the families that he works with. This new perspective will only help him become even more effective as a family law attorney.